Legal Opinion

Howell v. Ott

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1938No. 33095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On January 10, 1934, Mrs. Virgie M. Cutrer departed this life, leaving a will in which Y.E. Howell was named as executor, with directions that he be permitted to qualify and act as such without giving bond or reporting to any court or tribunal in the premises. The will, bearing date of October 6, 1932, reads as follows:

"I, Virgie M. Cutrer, a resident citizen of Clarksdale, in Coahoma county, Mississippi, being conscious of the uncertainty of life, and the certainty of death, and being in possession of my mental faculties, and desiring to make disposition of my property to take effect at my…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moss Point Lumber Co. v. Harrison CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. KibbeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Gordon v. JamesMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Carradine v. Estate of CarradineMississippi Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. LANHAM v. HowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ferguson v. MorganMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Riegelhaupt v. OstroffskyMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Baum v. BransonMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Campbell v. CasonMississippi Supreme Court · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API