Little v. Cellco P'ship
United States District Court
1Opinion of the Court
David A. Faber, Senior United States District Judge
This matter is about whether Verizon's Customer Agreement, which contains an arbitration clause, binds the defendant, Judy Little, and requires the court to submit this action to arbitration. For the reasons that follow, the defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceeding pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (ECF No. 5) is hereby GRANTED and plaintiff's action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
Judy Little purchased a mobile hotspot device on October 21, 2015, at a Verizon *510Wireless retail location in Princeton, West…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Whiteside v. Teltech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Berbig v. U-Haul Co of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
- Perry B. Gains v. Antero Resources Corporation et al.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2026