Legal Opinion

Byron O. Taxi, Inc. v. Swartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 2000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to prohibit respondent Supreme Court Justice from conducting an inquest in an underlying personal injury action, on written submissions alone, pursuant to the “Special Rules on Submission of Inquests, Justice Richard B. Lowe, IAS Part 22,” unanimously denied, and the petition dismissed, without costs.

Petitioners, as defendants in the underlying personal injury action, defaulted by failing to appear for a court-ordered deposition. After respondent-plaintiff filed a note of issue demanding a nonjury inquest, petitioners’ attorneys received a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rush v. MordueNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. La Rocca v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. MATTER OF PIRRO v. AngiolilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Hochberg v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hirschfeld v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Ruzal v. MohammadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API