Legal Opinion

M.B.L., Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 13, 2017No. 14-56107Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant M.B.L., Inc. (MBL) appeals from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of Appel-lees Federal Insurance (Federal), Great American Insurance (Great American), and Utica Mutual Insurance (Utica) (collectively, Apellees).

MBL, a now-defunct dry cleaning products company, asserts that the district court erred in holding that Federal, Great American, and Utica did not have a duty to defend MBL in an environmental lawsuit. MBL maintains-that its failure to-tender the environmental lawsuit to the insurers was not fatal to its coverage claim because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. California Shoppers, Inc. v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Powerine Oil Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Unigard InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Cravens, Dargan & Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Barboza v. California Ass'n of Professional FirefightersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API