Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Walter

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 28, 1970No. 2 CA-CR 209Published

1ConcurrenceHoward, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur in the foregoing opinion only for the reason that our Supreme Court had spoken on the matter and, therefore, has mandated my concurrence. I believe, however, that the matter involved merits closer examination. The judicial cliché that “probation is a matter of grace and not of right” was spawned in the case of Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L.Ed. 266 (1932) and perpetuated in Escoe v. Zerbst, 295 U.S. 490, 55 S.Ct. 818, 79 L.Ed. 1566 (1935). The best that can be said about the principle enunciated by these cases is that it is easy to…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API