Legal Opinion
Preston v. Nagel
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 1, 2017No. 2016-1524PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUGHES, Circuit Judge.
The district court remanded this case to state court for a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Because 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) bars review of the district court’s decision to remand, we dismiss this appeal.
I
Plaintiffs (collectively, Preston) filed a complaint against Defendants (collectively, *1384Nagel) in Massachusetts Superior Court alleging fifteen state-law claims. Nagel answered the complaint and filed eleven counterclaims under the Declaratory Judgment Act seeking declarations of non-infringement of several patents held by plaintiff Electromagnetics Corporation. Nagel…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Data Corporation v. InselbergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Intellisoft, Ltd. v. Acer America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Erdman v. FalknerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019