Legal Opinion
Sibel Onasis Ferrer v. Madalena Elizabeth Almanza, Isabella P. Almanza, and Albert Boone Almanza
Texas Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 2023No. 21-0513Published
1Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 21-0513 ══════════ Sibel Onasis Ferrer, Petitioner, v. Madalena Elizabeth Almanza, Isabella P. Almanza, and Albert Boone Almanza, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas ═══════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BUSBY, dissenting. Discussions of statutory interpretation can seem frothy and academic, with law review articles, books, and panels by the dozen exploring the latest twist or seeking to create a new trend. But the subject of how courts should…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re Department of Family & Protective ServicesTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Ashley v. HawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.