Legal Opinion
Local 2094, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Howard University Hospital
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 12, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-0873 JHGPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Local 2094, American Federation of State, County And Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (“the Union”) and defendant Howard University Hospital (“the Hospital”) are parties to a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”). In 1995, the Hospital laid off a number of employees covered by the CBA, the term of art for the layoffs being a reduction in force (“RIF”). The Union filed grievances protesting the Hospital’s selection of the employees that were laid off or “RIFed.” Pursuant to the CBA, the grievances were aired in an evidentiary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Teamsters Local Union No. 61 v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998