Legal Opinion

Pope v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1944No. 30255PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

It was not error to overrule the special demurrers, which were filed after the return term. Smith v. Aultman, 30 Ga. App. 507 (118 S. E. 459). The amendment to the answer did not change the defense, or add a new one, so as to open the answer to special demurrers.(a)' It was not error to overrule the general demurrer. The Code, § 29-201, relating to an apportionment of price in ease of a deficiency in the quantity of lands conveyed, has no application under the facts of this case. Section 29-202 does. That section reads: “If the purchaser loses part of the land from defect of title, he may…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Patellis v. TannerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Satterfield v. SpierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Smith v. AultmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Holliday v. AshfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  5. Riehle v. Bank of BullochvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oxford v. ShumanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API