Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1936No. 8389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McClendon, chief justice.

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants below (appellees) in a suit to set aside an order of the Railroad Commission granting to appellee Jackson a permit to drill an oil well upon a .13-acre tract in the East Texas oil field as an exception to Spacing Rule 37, in order “to prevent confiscation of property.”

The case may be more readily understood by reference to the following map: the points A, B, C, D. The points A, E, F, D, or B, E, F, C (the controversy as to which is unimportant in our view of the case), describe what we shall refer to as the “Church tract.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Stewart v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Edgar v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Smith v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. WenckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Gardner v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Gardner v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API