Legal Opinion

Drake v. Drake

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1949PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

Defendant herein, appearing specially, moves for an order “ setting aside the summons herein and dismissing this action on the ground that the copies of the summons and complaint allegedly served upon the defendant, copies of which are hereto attached, fail to comply with the requirements of rule 45 of the Buies of Civil Practice and sections 218 and 255 of the Civil Practice Act in that the same fail to state the county where plaintiff resides and the county which the plaintiff designates as the place of trial ”.

Section 218 of the Civil Practice Act provides in part: “ Buies may be made…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuyvesant v. . WeilNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . SidorskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Page v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rock Wool Insulation Co. v. PumaWhite Plains City Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API