Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ward

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 1946No. 36,596PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This appeal involves the right of an attorney to collect money belonging to his clients as a result of a partition proceeding.

In order to comprehend the nature of the controversy it will be necessary to briefly relate the conditions and circumstances responsible for its existence.

Back in January, 1944, John H. Silsby, a resident of Coffey county, Kansas, died intestate leaving a large estate consisting of both real and personal property. He left no wife, children or parents. In due time proceedings were instituted for the administration of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dolan v. Van DemarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Erwin v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  3. Hendrix v. FullerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Brown v. GrimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  5. Kerr v. ReeceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coos County v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Bucher & Willis Consulting Engineers v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Pearcy v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API