Legal Opinion

Western & Southern Life Insurance v. Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1988No. 87-3610PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

George and Regina Smith, the defendants-third party plaintiffs-appellants in this action (collectively referred to as the Smiths or appellants), have appealed from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Samuel Pierce, the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereafter referred to as the Secretary or as HUD). The Smiths had sought declaratory and injunctive relief mandating HUD to accept assignment of the appellant’s home mortgage.

The record disclosed the following underlying facts. The Smiths had executed a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Western & Southern Life Insurance Company v. George SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Gary L. Blackwell v. Michael L. MottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  3. Hargrave v. HollyfieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Howard v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  5. Washington v. BushDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API