People v. Huddleston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he acted recklessly in causing the death of the victim is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Henrius, 6 AD3d 548 [2004]; People v Addison, 290 AD2d 453 [2002]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of manslaughter in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law § 15.05…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. TerreroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. BochiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. PileggiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.