Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Bowater Inc. Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided November 26, 2002No. Case No. 1:01-CV-683PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ENSLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court to considerate three separate issues: (1) whether to certify this action as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23; (2) whether to grant or deny the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants (Bowater Incorporated and its Retirement Plan) and the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiff Frank J. Crosby; and (3) whether to award equitable remedies in the event that Plaintiff succeeds as to his Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment.
On review of the briefing and the papers filed in this matter, the Court dispenses with…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Administrative Committee of the Wal-Mart Associates Health & Welfare Plan v. WillardDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- West v. Ak Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- West v. AK Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McCutcheon v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.