Legal Opinion

Holland v. Enright

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 23, 1934No. [No. 56, October Term, 1934.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

Ruth Pease Enright, on October 8th, 1933, filed in the Orphans’ Court of Baltimore County a caveat to the will of one Peter Johnson, against Peter Holland, the executor named in the will, to whom letters testamentary on the estate had been granted. In that caveat she stated that the heirs at law of the decedent were a brother, Evan Johnson, and three great-nieces, of whom she was one, and then set up the grounds usually alleged in such cases as reasons why the will should be set aside.

Under that will Ruth Enright, the caveator, was entitled to a legacy of $166.67, and on February 11th, 1933,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pegg v. WarfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  2. Dronenburg v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  3. Schmidt v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Little Sisters of the Poor v. CushingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hill v. LewisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Schlossberg v. SchlossbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Harlan v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Ades v. NorinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  5. Holland v. EnrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API