Legal Opinion

Giblin v. National Steamship Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 15, 1894Published

Appeal from judgment, entered on verdict of a jury, and from order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGildebsleeve, J.

The assignors of the plaintiff purchased ten horses in Yorkshire, England, and entered into a contract with the defendant, a foreign corporation, engaged in the business of transporting passengers and freight between Great Britain and the United States, whereby defendant agreed to carry the horses from Liverpool, by the steamship “ Queen,” to the city of New York. In loading the horses upon the steamship at Liverpool, one of the horses fell overboard, and was drowned. This action is to recover the value of the horse thus lost, together with ten pounds, which had been paid for freight thereon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Popfinger v. . YutteNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Evans v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  3. Cragin v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Penn v. . Buffalo Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. McLean v. St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API