Legal Opinion
Alegre v. Contreras
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 14, 2021No. 3:16-cv-02442Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDY ALEGRE, et al., Case No.: 16-cv-2442-AJB-KSC Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER: v. 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 14 Defendants. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; and 15 (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 16 MOTION FOR SUMMARY 17 JUDGMENT 18 (Doc. Nos. 176 & 183) 19 20 Presently before the Court is (1) Cindy Alegre, et. al.’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for 21 Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication of Facts (Doc. No. 176); and 22 (2) Defendants United States of America, Department of the Interior, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.