Legal Opinion

Grillo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 11, 1930No. 4359Published

1Per curiam

Without entering into details of this ease, it suffices to say the record fails to show that any exception was taken at the trial raising the alleged error now sought to be reviewed. Moreover, the trial judge refused to certify that such exception was taken. There is no allegation that there was anything arbitrary done by the judge. Under the authorities, Suydam v. Williamson, 29 How. 427, 15 L. Ed. 978; Fraina v. U. S., 255 F. 28 (C. C. A. 2d); Allemanni v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 273 F. 523; Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Lanier, 95 U. S. 171, 24 L. Ed. 383, we decline to review sueh alleged errors, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suydam v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Fraina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Insurance Co. v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Allemanni v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API