Legal Opinion

City of Harlingen v. Alvarez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 16, 2006No. 13-03-00169-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

Opinion by

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · CastilloJustice Castillo

I join the majority in overruling the motion for rehearing on the new argument presented. However, I would grant rehearing to reconsider our disposition on original submission and, in that regard, respectfully dissent. See Houston E. & W.T.R. Co. v. Jackson, 299 S.W. 885, 886 (Tex.1927) (holding that the judgment of an appellate court has none of the elements of finality pending disposition of a motion for rehearing duly filed and has the power to address errors sua sponte as well as errors properly assigned) (citations omitted).

Appellant, the City of Harlingen, appealed the denial…

3Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Subaru of America, Inc. v. David McDavid Nissan, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API