Legal Opinion
Murray v. Young
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erroneously granted summary judgment to defendants in this private nuisance action. The issue of whether a use constitutes a private nuisance ordinarily turns on questions of fact, one of which concerns the reasonableness of the use under the circumstances (Copart Inds. v Consolidated Edison Co., 41 NY2d 564; McCarhy v Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 189 NY 40). Here, the record of testimony taken at examinations before trial reveals conflicting testimony as to the reasonableness of defendants’ activities and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Ugarriza v. SchmiederNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- McCarty v. . Natural Carbonic Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Sweet v. CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Futerfas v. ShultisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Allison v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Derek Donnelly v. FortuNato NicotraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Schaefer v. DehauskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rashford v. RandazzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.