Legal Opinion

Phipps v. Phipps

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Court. Action for the partition of certain land. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This is the second time that this plaintiff in error has brought this case to this court for review. For a statement of most of the material facts, see 39 Kas. 495. The action is one for partition of the east half of section No. 36, township 23, range 23, in Bourbon county. This court *329held when the case was here before that Daniel Van Buskirk and William H. Van Buskirk held the title to the southeast quarter in trust only, so far as William and Nora Phipps are concerned, and this court ordered that an accounting must be had and the property partitioned as the interests…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sarbach v. NewellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Phipps v. PhippsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fry v. DeweesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Sawin v. OsbornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Gillet v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Goodnough v. WebberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API