Legal Opinion
Ingham v. Thompson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 23, 2014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CPLR 7511 provides the exclusive grounds for vacatur of an arbitration award, and none of those grounds have been presented here (see Frankel v Sardis, 76 AD3d 136, 139 [1st Dept 2010]; Matter of New York State Nurses Assn. [Nyack Hosp.], 258 AD2d 303 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 810 [1999]). Hence, the Supreme Court should have granted plaintiffs motion to confirm the arbitration award, and denied respondents’ cross motion to vacate it.
Respondents’ arguments that plaintiff should have been disqualified from maintaining the arbitration proceeding alleging, inter alia, breach of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lentine v. FundaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hackett v. Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re the Arbitration between Raisler Corp. & New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Tajan v. Pavia & HarcourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Roffler v. Spear, Leeds & KelloggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bortman v. LucanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- AIG v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of NRT N.Y. LLC v. SpellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018