Legal Opinion
Cranston v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 2010No. 29A02-1003-CR-374PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Timothy Cranston appeals his conviction for Class A misdemeanor operating a vehicle while intoxicated with an alcohol concentration of .15 or greater. Cranston was arrested for drunk driving. He submitted to a B.A.C. Datamaster chemical breath test. The Datamaster machine printed an evidence ticket stating that Cranston's blood alcohol concentration was .15. At trial, the State introduced the evidence ticket along with foundational testimony from the arresting officer. Cranston argues that the admission of the Datamaster ticket without live testimony from an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. ChunSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- v. HamiltonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- v. AmbroseColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- v. AmbroseColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
- Bryan Priest v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023
- Jason Baldwin v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.