Legal Opinion

State v. Nieman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 11, 1974No. 74-94PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The State appeals an order suppressing certain tangible evidence seized following a warrantless search of an automobile which had been driven by appellee-Nieman. We conclude that on the basis of the information then known to the officers conducting the search, coupled with the surrounding circumstances, the officers had probable cause to believe that the automobile contained contraband and thus the search was not illegal. Carroll v. United States, 1925, 267 U.S. 132, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543; State v. Miller, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 352; State v. Sanders, Fla.App. 1970, 239 So.2d 120.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. State v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  3. State v. SandersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardwicke Companies, Incorporated v. FreedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. State v. HallDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API