Baker v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s conviction and reject his claim that the trial court improperly honored a codefendant’s refusal to testify in the face of the unchallenged and unrebutted statements on the record by the trial court that no plea agreement by the codefendant had yet been accepted by the court. See Ivey v. Eastmoore, 402 So.2d 1248, 1249 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Meehan v. State, 397 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Dearing v. State, 388 So.2d 296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Brinson v. State, 382 So.2d 322 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); King v. State, 353 So.2d 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Cf. Lopez v. State, 349 So.2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meehan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Dearing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Lopez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Brinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.