Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Bramlett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1995No. 4-94-0149Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE STEIGMANN,

specially concurring:

I agree with the decision to affirm but write separately on the issue of defendant’s impeachment by his prior convictions for three reasons: (1) defendant waived this issue, and the admission of defendant’s prior convictions for impeachment does not constitute plain error; (2) the trial court could have — and should have — avoided the error the majority found by handling defendant’s prior convictions differently, and more appropriately; and (3) I disagree with the majority’s reading of Williams and reject defendant’s argument on the merits.

I. NO PLAIN…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. McKibbinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  4. People v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API