Legal Opinion

United States v. Corona Coal Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1928No. 5212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant in error brought suit in the District Court, under the provisions of the Tucker Act (now •section 24, par. 20, Judicial Code [28 USCA § 41, par. 20]), to recover certain taxes alleged to have been erroneously assessed and collected, and was awarded judgment in the sum of $11,073.14. The only question presented is whether plaintiff was entitled to deduct on its income and exeess profits taxes returns for the year 1918 the cost of opening two shafts in its coal mines, under tho provisions of section 234 (a) (8) of the Revenue Act of 1918 (Comp. St. § 6336%>p),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corona Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  2. Dillabaugh v. EllertonColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Diamond Alkali Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  4. Arkansas-Oklahoma Gas Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  5. Briggs Mfg. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API