Board of County Commissioners v. Isenberg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District, Court of Garfield County; before , Tno. L. McAtee, District Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. On December 1, 1897, defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, filed his petition in the district court of Garfield county, alleging that defendant was indebted to him for furnishing material for, and printing bar dockets to be used by the clerk of said court; that said dockets were printed by order of the county commissioners, and accepted by them, and…
Read the full summary
Error from the District, Court of Garfield County; before , Tno. L. McAtee, District Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE. On December 1, 1897, defendant in error, plaintiff in the court below, filed his petition in the district court of Garfield county, alleging that defendant was indebted to him for furnishing material for, and printing bar dockets to be used by the clerk of said court; that said dockets were printed by order of the county commissioners, and accepted by them, and used by the clerk of said court; that defendants refused to pay for said material and work, and to said petition was…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
Irwin, J.:
The first contention of defendant is that said petition does not show that the plaintiff in (he court below was the owner of said account, nor show that said account was ever assigned to him. A reference to said petition will show that this- suit was brought by the defendant Isenberg, as the successor of the Wave Printing company, and the statements in said petition are that the material was furnished and the printing done by said successor, and not by the Wave Printing Company; hence no allegation of assignment would be necessary, and the allegation that…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Texas Co. v. State ex rel. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Rexroth v. HollowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.