Legal Opinion

Damrow Bros. Co. v. Stoelting Bros. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 5, 1924No. 3234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

Appellant seeks to reverse a decree holding claims 1, 2, and 3 of McKinnon patent No. 735,133, granted August *4934, 1903, and claims 1, 3, and 6 of McKinnon patent No. 828,421, granted August 14, 1906, to be valid and infringed by appellant. Appellant urges the invalidity of all the claims and noninfringement of claims 1 and 3 of patent No. 828,421.

In the cheese-making art there were many inventions, from 1840 to 1894, when Feldmeier procured his patent No. 529,856, so strongly relied upon by appellant as anticipating the first McKinnon patent.

Both McKinnon and Feldmeier used…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Sodemann Heat & Power Co. v. KauffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  4. De Vry Corp. v. Acme Motion Picture Projector Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gatch Wire Goods Co. v. W. A. Laid-Law Wire Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. C. O. Tingley & Co. v. Badger Rubber WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API