Legal Opinion

State v. Holt

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1984PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

In the first count of the indictments in these cases, appellants were charged with unlawfully and feloniously manufacturing marijuana, a Schedule VI controlled substance. In the second count they were indicted for possessing marijuana with intent to sell. Appellants were convicted and sentenced under both counts, the sentences, however, being made concurrent. In its opinion the Court of Criminal Appeals expressly held that convictions under both counts could stand, differing with other panels of the Court of Criminal Appeals which had held to the contrary.

Appellants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. LayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  3. State v. BakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  4. State v. CampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. KennedyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. RossTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. DesireyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  3. State v. CothranCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  5. State v. RuckerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API