Legal Opinion

Claim of Terwilliger v. Green Fuel Economizer, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 30,1982. Claimant contends that the board erred in apportioning his award between the industrial accident and the pre-existing condition and, further, that the board erred in finding his disability to be moderate. As to whether claimant’s entire disability is compensable, the crucial factor is whether claimant’s industrial accident acted on the pre-existing condition in such a manner as to cause disability which did not previously exist (Matter of Kuczkowski v Bethlehem Steel Corp., 90 AD2d 612, 613, affd 58 NY2d 946).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Kuczkowski v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. MATTER OF KUCZKOWSKI v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Claim of Parish v. Rolex Plastics, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Claim of Podlish v. McGraw Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crosland v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  2. Claim of Kozlowski v. Howard Sober, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API