Legal Opinion
Realvirt, LLC v. Lee
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 19, 2016No. Case No. 1:15-cv-963PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
T. S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge
In this 35 U.S.C. § 145 action, plaintiff challenges a United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) decision rejecting the patentability of the inventions claimed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/773, 161 (the “161 Application”). At issue on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment and the PTO’s motion to dismiss are (i) whether plaintiff has standing to bring a § 145 action, and (ii) if so, whether the inventions claimed in the 161 Application are patentable. As the matter has been fully briefed and argued…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Realvirt, LLC v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Realvirt, LLC v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
- Ambimjb, LLC v. Strategic Armory Corps, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- PPI/TimeZero, Inc. v. Zenith Firearms, Inc., SouthStar Financial, LLC and Critzer Road Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025