City of Los Angeles v. Wilshire Crest Medical Group
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAIDIG, J. *
Appellant taxpayer complains of the manner in which the City of Los Angeles seeks to apply its tax on business activities. Such complaint verges on an invitation to an éxcursion in frivolity.
We are importuned to ignore the definition of the term “gross income” contained in the statute establishing the tax in question and to substitute therefor the definition of the term “receipts” contained in a legal dictionary which, in turn, used as its source a Tennessee case construing a statute of that state. We decline, for the reasons hereafter stated, to indulge in such an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estate of RathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Lockhart v. WoldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Los Angeles v. Clinton Merchandising Corp.California Supreme Court · 1962
- City of Los Angeles v. Security Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- State Ex Rel. v. Texas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Berkeley v. CukiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993