Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance of America v. Hartford Fire Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 1965No. Civ. No. 22368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.

Declaratory judgment determined that the policies of plaintiff and defendant both afforded primary coverage and thus should share pro-rata the bodily injury liability arising from an automobile collision. Defendant-cross-complainant appeals, urging that plaintiff’s coverage is primary, and its own but excess.

Eureka Valley Cooperative is an unincorporated association. It is a water and soil conservation group, whose members are owners of lands in Inyo County. On February 12, 1961, members of the group met in that county with Mr. Kelsey, who was not a member but was acting as manager. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Daniels v. Sanitarium Assn., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McAdam v. State National InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. American Casualty Company of Reading, Penn. v. Bert SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API