Legal Opinion

Clark v. Fitzgerald Water, Light & Bond Commission

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 20, 2007No. A07A0702, A07A0703PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

The Fitzgerald Water, Light & Bond Commission (the “Utilities Commission”) filed a complaint for breach of contract against Bobby Clark to recover the costs of providing water and sewer lines to a residential subdivision that Clark had developed. On June 23, 2006, following a jury trial, the trial court entered its judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of the Utilities Commission and against Clark in the amount of $52,414 - $39,914 as unpaid principal on the contract, plus $12,500 as prejudgment interest at the rate of four percent per annum from July 28, 1998.

In Case No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cravey v. Southeastern Underwriters Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  2. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Foskey v. Vidalia City SchoolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Voxcom, Inc. v. BodaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Fitzgerald Water, Light & Bond CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  2. Clark v. FITZGERALD WATER, LIGHT & BOND COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API