Legal Opinion

Hart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 31, 1942No. 7940PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Associate Justice.

Appellant was tried in the District Court for the killing of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder. On this appeal he relies upon four alleged errors. He challenges, first, the admission of testimony concerning his mental condition at the time of the trial. This testimony was offered by the Government to rebut evidence of appellant’s insanity at the time of the homicide. Appellant contends that the testimony “was immaterial and tended to confuse the jury.” The general rule is that in order to ascertain a person’s mental condition at a particular time it…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Goldstein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Nueslein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Gordon Alexander, United States of America v. Benjamin MurdockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Aubrey WhartonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Nicholson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API