Winningham v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
By his motion under Rule 27.26, the mov-ant seeks to have his sentence of life imprisonment vacated. This Court has jurisdiction. Bryant v. State, 604 S.W.2d 669 (Mo. App.1980). The movant was so sentenced when he entered a plea of guilty to a charge of first degree felony murder. He was accorded an evidentiary hearing upon his motion under Rule 27.26. The trial *146court made careful and detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law upon the several issues presented and denied the motion. On appeal, the movant presents but one point of error. Only a very brief summary of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- State v. HandleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hayden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lamb v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Skaggs v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988