Legal Opinion

Blaisdell v. Steamboat William Pope

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioners Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGamble, Judge

1. The officer having a writ to seize the boat William Pope, made his return upon it in these words : “ Executed this writ in the county of St. Louis, by going on board the steamboat *158Wm. Pope and offering to road the writ and petition to Selar Simons, captain • also by leaving a true copy of this writ and petition at the usual place of abode of Oliver Harris, with a white person of the family, above the age of fifteen years. February 22, 1853. ■ This return is defective in not stating that he had seized the boat.

A judgment was rendered by default and damages assessed. A motion was made to set…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muldrow v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
  2. Irvine v. ScobeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  3. Maulsby v. FarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1834

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Feurt v. CasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  2. Phillips v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Dwiggins v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Priest v. CapitainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Webster v. BlountSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API