Blaisdell v. Steamboat William Pope
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Law Commissioners Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGamble, Judge
1. The officer having a writ to seize the boat William Pope, made his return upon it in these words : “ Executed this writ in the county of St. Louis, by going on board the steamboat *158Wm. Pope and offering to road the writ and petition to Selar Simons, captain • also by leaving a true copy of this writ and petition at the usual place of abode of Oliver Harris, with a white person of the family, above the age of fifteen years. February 22, 1853. ■ This return is defective in not stating that he had seized the boat.
A judgment was rendered by default and damages assessed. A motion was made to set…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Muldrow v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1838
- Irvine v. ScobeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
- Maulsby v. FarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1834
3Cited by17 opinions
- Feurt v. CasterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Phillips v. EvansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Dwiggins v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Priest v. CapitainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Webster v. BlountSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.