Legal Opinion

Russell v. Industrial Development Board of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 29, 2010No. 1080884PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

The plaintiffs1 in the underlying actions sued the petitioner, the Industrial Devel*701opment Board of the City of Montgomery (“the IDB”), in the Montgomery Circuit Court alleging breach of contract. During discovery, the plaintiffs sought to depose Thomas T. Gallion III, one of the attorneys for the IDB. The trial court denied the IDB’s motion for a protective order preventing Gallion’s deposition, and the IDB has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate the order denying the IDB’s motion for a protective order and to enter an order granting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte Indus. Dev. Bd. of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API