Legal Opinion

Broadard v. Hubbard Regional Hospital

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a medical malpractice tribunal must be convened in cases where it is clear to the judge that as a matter of law the offer of proof, if substantiated at trial, would be sufficient to withstand a motion for a directed verdict. G. L. c. 231, § 60B. See Little v. Rosenthal, 376 Mass. 573, 578 (1978). The defendant appeals from an order of a Superior Court judge that the plaintiff’s offer of proof “is sufficient to raise a legitimate question of liability appropriate for judicial inquiry,” G. L. c. 231, § 60B, without an initial screening by a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Little v. RosenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kopycinski v. AserkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Denton v. Beth Israel HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Jasper v. TomaioloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  4. Pallazola v. RuckerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  5. Kopycinski v. AserkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API