Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Knapp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 2003No. 00-2590-CRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 221. (concurring in part, dissenting in part). I dissent from the court's resolution of the certified issue, Part V of the majority opinion. The majority concludes that the United States Supreme Court's decision in Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000), "fundamentally altered" the Court's jurisprudence regarding the applicability of the Fourth *369Amendment "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine in the context of Fifth Amendment Miranda1 violations. Majority op., ¶ 66-67.

¶ 222. As the majority notes, the Supreme Court has generally distinguished between Fourth and Fifth Amendment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API