Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 5, 1973No. Docket No. 1372-72Published

The petitioner was required by her union to report to the union hall to receive her work assignment for the day. Held, costs incurred in driving to work from the union hall and parking at work are nondeductible commuting expenses.

1Opinion of the Court

Russell Anderson and Elsie Anderson, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Anderson v. Commissioner

Docket No. 1372-72

United States Tax Court

60 T.C. 834; 1973 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 67; 60 T.C. No. 88;

September 5, 1973, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 50.

The petitioner was required by her union to report to the union hall to receive her work assignment for the day. Held, costs incurred in driving to work from the union hall and parking at work are nondeductible commuting expenses.

Joel Kamens, for the petitioners.

Justin S. Holden, for the respondent.

Simpson, Judge.

SIMPS…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Fausner v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Heuer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. William W. Steinhort and Mildred Steinhort v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  5. Green v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API