Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Buckalew

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1895No. Civil No. 453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment oí the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. J. D. ¡Bethune, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtRouse, J.

This is an action in ejectment for block 184 in the city of Tucson, Pima County, Arizona. Buckalew was the owner of said block 184. Said block was a square, bounded by streets on all sides, and covered with buildings fronting on the several streets, so built as to make them in appearance one building. The buildings in fact were separate houses joined together, and occupied by different families as dwellings. The whole block was assessed as one piece, and valued for that purpose at five thousand dollars. Buckalew failing to pay the taxes on said block, it became delinquent, and was advertised…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. French v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Roth v. GabbertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Weaver v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. People v. CulverwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kregelo v. FlintSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. Peoria Ginning Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API