Legal Opinion

Charles B. Smith, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Edward S. Birn, Deceased v. Milton Sperling

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1960No. 16387Published

1Per curiam

This case was up on appeal previously. Smith v. Sperling, 9 Cir., 1956, 237 F.2d 317, reversed, 1957, 354 U.S. 91, 77 S.Ct. 1112, 1 L.Ed.2d 1205.

It started by the filing on December 15, 1948, of a typical minority stockholder’s derivative suit brought by the plaintiff, a citizen of New York, against Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., and United States Pictures, Inc., both Delaware corporations, and against certain named individuals, Harry M. Warner, Jack L. Warner, and Milton Sperling, all citizens of California. Sperling was the son-in-law of Harry M. Warner. Originally the complaint contained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Smith v. SperlingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  3. Smith v. SperlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API