Legal Opinion

(PC) Cervantes v. Salazar

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 1, 2019No. 2:15-cv-02686Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SALVADOR CERVANTES, No. 2:15-CV-2686-KJM-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SALAZAR, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment (ECF 19 No. 27). Defendant contends judgement of dismissal is appropriate as a matter of law because 20 plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit. 21 22 I. PLAINTIFF’S…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API