Legal Opinion

Anthony Durkan v. Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 4, 1989No. 88-3389Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

873 F.2d 1451

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Anthony DURKAN, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent.

No. 88-3389.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 1989.

Before RICH, Circuit Judge, BALDWIN, Senior…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anthony R. Hambsch, III v. Department of the Treasury, United States Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. John G. Hagmeyer v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Francis J. Hanratty, III v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API