Legal Opinion

Fordock v. City of Syracuse

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert G. Hurlbutt, J.

This CPLR article 78 proceeding is commenced by two employees of the respondent City of Syracuse seeking a judg*131ment "annulling, cancelling and setting aside the Respondent’s implementation of Section 8-112 (2) of the City Charter of the City of Syracuse-1960.” The proceeding is brought as a class action, and the parties have in their papers addressed the appropriateness thereof. However, since no specific motion for an order determining whether a class action may be maintained pursuant to CPLR 902 has been made, any consideration whether the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. McCarthy v. Philadelphia Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Baumes v. LavineNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Granada Buildings, Inc. v. City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Eden v. Board of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API