Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hall v. Abel Investment Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1974No. 39406Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClinton, J.

If the allegations of the plaintiff’s amended petition are true, as they must be assumed to be for the purposes of the demurrer, then he is entitled to some relief even though it is not the relief for which he prays. The City of Lincoln concedes in its brief that if he proves the al*258legations of his petition he would be entitled to have the conveyance set aside because it was obtained by reason of a misrepresentation that the property was being acquired for public use when in fact it was being acquired for private use. The City argues merely that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burger v. City of BeatriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Rankin v. BiggerNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Moritz v. BuglewiczNebraska Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API