Legal Opinion

United States v. A. J. Allen

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1969No. 115-68PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

On trial to the court without a jury, the defendant-appellant was found guilty of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421. He appeals from the judgment imposing sentence.

Defendant was charged in- a seven-count indictment. Four of the counts related to a woman named Davis and the other three to a woman named Whitehurst. On motion of the defendant, the Davis counts were severed from the Whitehurst counts. Later, a jury was waived and the government dismissed all but Count III pertaining to Davis and Count VI pertaining to Whitehurst.

The defendant was arrested on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Motes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Freddie Joseph Phillips v. Donald W. Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API